<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Blog on VasilRYordanov</title>
    <link>https://www.landflier.com/blog/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Blog on VasilRYordanov</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2026 23:25:36 +0100</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.landflier.com/blog/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>A new habit</title>
      <link>https://www.landflier.com/blog/time-blocking/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.landflier.com/blog/time-blocking/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h1 id=&#34;time-blocking&#34;&gt;Time-blocking&lt;/h1&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;I recently stumbled upon an idea for structuring a work-day: time-blocking. The idea has been around for a while, but I accidentally stumbled upon it while looking for a calendar/time-planner. The main proponent of time-blocking is Cal Newport, and although I have been hesistant to read his book, due to its popularity with the self-improvement community, his time-block calendar has been a game changer.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Chaos reigns</title>
      <link>https://www.landflier.com/blog/scientific-method/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.landflier.com/blog/scientific-method/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This blog post is inspired by a training I attended on Academic writing. During the training, our linguistics trainer quoted Karl Popper, and referred to Noam Chomsky to back up his arguments about how scientific writing should be done. To my surprise, he had never heard of Paul Fayerabend - a student of Popper, who nonetheless had a completely opposite view of how science should be conducted. Because Popper seems to be popping off &amp;hellip; and is being mentioned in almost all trainings I attended on science-related topics, I want to write a bit about how I feel about his views on science. I plan to read his book &lt;code&gt;On &lt;/code&gt;, but before I do, I will foolhardly put forward an uninformed opinion, which I allow to be refuted after having read the man.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How research is a creative act</title>
      <link>https://www.landflier.com/blog/creative-act/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.landflier.com/blog/creative-act/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h1 id=&#34;why-research-is-an-art-form&#34;&gt;Why research is an art form&lt;/h1&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;When I started my PhD two months ago, my idea of research was a bit too stringent. The concept I had of research was poorly informed by having read research papers, having listened to academic presentaitons, and having talked to scientists about their topics. But there is a whole epistemological question lying dormant througout any PhD journey, which I believe even senior acedmics forget (or miss altogther) to ask of their students - what is knowledge, how does one create new knowledge, and what is the process.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
